A reminder that Auckland Council is consulting on its Long Term Plan 2021-2031 Use the link to give your support to the extension of the Water Quality Targeted Rate and sustain improvements to stormwater infrastructure on the Auckland Isthmus. Closing time: 12 noon Monday 22 March.
With reference to our prior post below, Anin Nama from Watercare has provided responses below, and indicated willingness to discuss.
Q Which Western Isthmus projects are stopped? Or will not start? As a result of Watercare Board decision of 23 December 2020? A: The Western Isthmus progarmme has not stopped and is funded to be completed by 2029. Committed project will continue, including works that integrate with CI. However, while funding has been reduced in the first 4 years, we will still continue with the design of the works.
Q: Which overflows, creeks or catchments are affected?. A: None, as the overall programme is still scheduled for completion by 2029.
Q: What benefits or usage of the Central Interceptor is delayed for 3 years? A: CI is still scheduled for completion by 2026 and will collect the large overflows in Meola and other overflows along its route.
Q: When will Eastern Isthmus project start ? Will it now proceed regardless of delays in the West?. A: The Watercare portion of the Eastern Isthmus is scheduled to start in 2025, subject to Healthy Water’s proposed targeted rate being approved in the current LTP process.
Q: What impact does this Watercare work have on the benefits of spending by Auckland Council Healthy Waters of the WQTR raised for water quality? A: The benefit of the WQTR allows separation to commence early and reduce the volume of stormwater entering the wastewater network. This allows Watercare to commence the necessary wastewater upgrades in the Eastern Isthmus.
STEPS looks forward to ongoing progress on water in the Auckland isthmus generally, particularly in the Western isthmus for the rest of this decade.
Ngā mihi nui, Elizabeth Walker
STEPS thanks Councillor Fletcher and Margi Watson Chair of Albert Eden Local Board who acknowledged our letter and the questions raised, as did member Jon Turner Member of Puketapapa Local Board.
Waititiko Meola Creek – debris after floods (S Elliott)Waititiko Meola Creek – debris on Cyperus sedge plant (S Elliott)
Kia ora Albert Eden Local Board, Councillors Fletcher and Casey,
We need your help please in relation to the Long Term Plan. Unless there is visible and strong advocacy from you as our elected representatives on water infrastructural issues, the pattern of many decades will be repeated, and the inner Western Isthmus suburbs will continue to be the waste water and stormwater receptacle for Auckland.
Auckland Council Long Term Plan submissions close on 22 March. AC is looking to extend Water Quality Targeted Rate (WQTR) by another 3 years to enhance water quality in Auckland.
While this sounds worthwhile, the reality of what work is happening in western isthmus suburbs casts doubt on the benefits of spending on this program.
On 23 December the Watercare Board delayed for at least 3 years: half their work on waste water pipe renewals, and their work on Western Isthmus program. (See background and news story below).
There is a lot of pressure from these Councillors to proceed with the Eastern Isthmus water infrastructure work. No answers were given on the changes to the Western Isthmus Program – though apparently Watercare may be asked.
Further, both Orakei Local Board and Waitemata Local Board both have specific local initiatives in the long term plan where “wastewater stormwater” and “water quality improvements” are key advocacy initiatives for 2021-2031. We understand both have undertaken a formal process whereby the board will monitor water infrastructure projects / issues and represent local impacts and interests in influencing the directions taken by Healthy Waters and Watercare. We cannot see what Albert Eden LB will do on water advocacy and water infrastructure in the LTP proposal. We cannot see any reflection of the importance of storm water and waste water infrastructure in our rohe and on local people and their health.
Requests to Councillors and Local Board:
In the interests of local democracy, we wish to know please, prior to completing our submissions, what Western Isthmus work has now been stopped for at least three years by Watercare Board’s decision of 23 December ?
To inform our LTP submissions, we request that Healthy Waters and Watercare jointly outline the implications of the decision and which Western Isthmus water projects are stopped for at least 3 years. This needs to be done by say 17 March to give communities and submitters at least 2-3 days to absorb the implications and prepare informed Long Term Plan submissions for 22 March. A zoom meeting is suggested.
Below are a few questions: In short – why should we continue to support WQTR (water quality targeted rate) when these delays sound exactly like the delays we have had for the past 50 years or more: the inner western isthmus receives the most overflows and poses too many challenges – let us sweep those areas under the rug again. This poses issues of community trust and we request that Healthy Waters and Watercare front it with our Governing Body members and Local Board, as well as the public.
Background:
It is widely acknowledged that Waitītiko Meola Creek has the most combined storm and waste water overflows in Auckland. This small creek flows through the heart of Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa Ward and Albert Eden Local Board area. Watercare and Healthy Waters had jointly planned and initiated the Western Isthmus (Water) Program (WIP) using money from WQTR, and the first 10 years of expenditure were to target the well known “combined sewer” issues in our rohe – the Western Isthmus https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/environment/looking-after-aucklands-water/water-quality-targeted-rate/Pages/western-isthmus-water-quality-improvement.aspx
Which Western Isthmus projects are stopped, or will not start as a result of Watercare Board decision of 23 December 2020?
Which overflows, creeks or catchments are affected?
What benefits of the Central Interceptor are delayed for 3 years, as a result of stopping Watercare western isthmus work?
When will Eastern Isthmus project start ? Will it now be able to proceed regardless of delays in the West?
What impact do delays in this Watercare waste water work have on the benefits of spending by Auckland Council Healthy Waters of the WQTR raised for water quality?
Request to Western Isthmus representatives:
We seek the pro-active involvement of all our western isthmus politicians in water and water infrastructure issues. The quality of life for your mokopuna and future generations of Aucklanders depends on us all being engaged, active and visible in relation to cleaning up our harbours and creeks. We need your leadership.
LONG TERM PLAN [LTP 2021-31]: submissions close 22 March 2021
Auckland Council [AC] LTP 2018-28 – had included the Western Isthmus project to address long standing storm water and combined sewer issues in Waitemata Harbour, and creeks including Meola, Oakley and others. AC took a strategic approach with a “water quality targeted rate” [WQTR] to fund AC Healthy waters stormwater works here. The expectation was that the work on Western Isthmus would be followed by similar work on Eastern Isthmus and elsewhere.
Now LTP 2021-31 is talking about extending the WQ targeted rate by 3 years which is good. However it does not acknowledge that Watercare Board held a special meeting on 23 Dec and decided to defer the Western Isthmus Program by 3 years. They would also undertake only 50% of planned renewals (ie fixing old and failing pipes). (see board paper for a fuller list).
Why is this major delay not clear in the LTP ? At very best this is disconnected decision making. The Long Term Plan does not give any choice to people – as presented it is a compromise. We contend they should have given options to the people of Auckland on both rates and Watercare pricing options. What are the implications for Eastern Isthmus? And what delays to other ”renewals” mean unhealthy spillages and polluted beaches throughout Auckland? Have your say on the Auckland Plan here.
No swimming on 50 Auckland beaches – 3 January 2021
Lack of transparency, and disconnected decisions contribute greatly to more of the same old same old… dirty creeks, beaches and harbours are an accepted part of life under Auckland Council. Why change now?
A recent review of Watercare’s performance by the Water Industry Commission for Scotland (WICS) recommended significantly MORE capital spending by Watercare and the ability for them to be able to borrow money outside of Auckland Council’s capital constraints. We understand this simply requires agreement between Auckland Council and Watercare, reversing an agreement they made 2-3 years ago.
Watercare Board could have chosen steeper price increases and continued with the WI. Perhaps they should have put the decision by Watercare to moderate price increases to a vote by people in Auckland. Instead the LTP runs counter to advice given to AC as recently as November 2020.
STEPS is developing a submission to cover these points and point out yet another major reversal by Auckland Council in relation to its poor water infrastructure. Please contact us to discuss this further.
Background: Watercare Board meeting 23 December 2020
Board paperspells out deferrals, see red/ blue lines. And spells out the motion at the end on p9
30m – 34M. A summary of all current Watercare capital expenditure projects (including CI and Western Isthmus)
1hr 05M – 1 hr 09M. Motion put by the chair to defer WI (among other projects) by three years.
1 hr 28 mentions western isthmus deferral
1 hr 34 M – Unanimous acceptance of the motion.
1 hr 20M – 24M there is an explanation of the inefficiency of Council ownership of Watercare and why consumers would be better off under Watercare stand alone.
